Occupational therapy students’ perspectives of ethics in two countries: South Africa and the United States of America

South Africa and the United States of America

Abstract

Objectives: Worldwide, health-care students, including occupational therapy students undergo ethics training. Ethics training facilitates students’ critical thinking, objective analysis and clinical reasoning skills to promote impartiality and minimize bias in decision-making. The aim of the study was to explore and describe similarities and differences in occupational therapy students’ perceptions and experiences of an ethical dilemma.


Methods: The study employed a descriptive qualitative approach. Eighty occupational therapy students from South Africa and the United States of America (USA) participated in the study as part of an online international ethics module. Data were collected from students’ written analyses of a case study engaging them in an ethics reasoning process and were analyzed thematically.


Results: Three themes emerged: Personal views and biases, ethical approaches, and practical alternatives and implications. Both groups of students from South Africa and the USA approached the case in a similar manner using their knowledge of ethics, principles, and approaches. They also applied the steps of an ethics reasoning process to guide their decision-making. All occupational therapy students from both countries highlighted Ethics of Care as an integral basis for their reasoning.


Conclusion: There is a need amongst educators to identify, share, and discuss similarities and differences in how health-care practitioners address ethical issues, using the ethics reasoning process as a guide. The international occupational therapy community needs to further the profession’s meta-ethical discourse to guide clinical application within a diverse and globally connected workforce.

Keywords:

Ethics Occupational therapy South Africa Students United States of America
de Jongh, J.-C., Brandt, L., & Wegner, L. (2019). Occupational therapy students’ perspectives of ethics in two countries: South Africa and the United States of America: South Africa and the United States of America. International Journal of Health Sciences, 13(4). Retrieved from https://pub.qu.edu.sa/index.php/journal/article/view/3767
Copyright and license info is not available

Author Biographies

Lea Brandt, University of Missouri

Dr. Lea Cheyney Brandt is an Associate Professional Practice Professor at the University of Missouri’s School of Medicine.  In addition, she serves in leadership positions as the Director for the Missouri Health Professions Consortium OTA Program, and Co-Director of the University of Missouri’s Center for Health Ethics. Dr. Brandt earned a Master of Arts in Bioethics and Health Policy from Loyola University Chicago and a Post-Professional Doctorate in Occupational Therapy with an emphasis in Healthcare Ethics and Administration from Creighton University.  Her doctoral training was conducted at Radboud University Nijmegen, Medical Ethics Department in the Netherlands and at the VHA National Center for Ethics located in New York City. She teaches clinical ethics throughout the University of Missouri Health System. 

Lisa Wegner, University of the Western Cape

Dr. Lisa Wegner is Professor in the Department of Occupational Therapy at the University of the Western Cape. She teaches Research Methods including research ethics at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels. Her research interests lie primarily in youth risk and resilience, and leisure.