Colonoscopy Completion Rates and Reasons for Incompletion

Authors

  • Badr Aljarallah
  • Badr Alshammari

Abstract

Objectives: Colonoscopy is one of the major procedures in gastroenterology. Since the procedure is operator dependant, Quality of each procedure is the main element of reliable outcome. One of the elements is the completion rate. Completion rate of endoscopy unit is a reliable measure to improve the quality of the procedure.

Methodology: We here reviewed retrospectively our endoscopy database from the main tertiary hospital in Qassim province, central part of Saudi Arabia. The recommended completion based on several professional societies range from 90 – 95 % completion rate according to the indication. We retrospectively reviewed our endoscopy database over the period from 2005 to 2008 in King Fahad Specialist Hospital.

Results: Our adjusted completion rate was 85.3 %.  The main reason of incompletion was poor preparation. Our completion rate was comparable throughout the study period. Conclusion: our completion rate is below recommended range. We think this result will stimulate the efforts to incorporate more quality measures in the endoscopy unit.

Key Words: Colonoscopy, Qassim Region

Downloads

Published

2012-04-30

How to Cite

Aljarallah, B., & Alshammari, B. (2012). Colonoscopy Completion Rates and Reasons for Incompletion. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(2). Retrieved from https://pub.qu.edu.sa/index.php/journal/article/view/399

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (5): ISSUE 10

Section

Original Paper

License


Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).