Penetrating Keratoplasty for Keratoconus: Visual and Graft Survival Outcomes
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the complications, and visual and graft survival outcomes in eyes that had undergone penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) for keratoconus.
Methodology: This restrospective study includes 311 patients with keratoconus who had undergone PKP between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2002, at King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital. All patients were followed up postoperatively (maximum follow-up, 65.77 months).
Results: The mean age of patients with keratoconus at transplantation was 23.72 years. A preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) OF 20/40 or better was achieved in 13 eyes (4.2%). At a mean follow-up of 27 months, 212 eyes (68.2%) achieved a BSCVA of 20/40 or better. Postoperative visual acuity was significantly associated with preoperative visual acuity (P < 0.00). Only 6 eyes (1.9%) experienced graft failure, with a mean follow-up of 23.62 months. The graft rejection rate (6.8%) was a significant risk factor for failure (P = 0.00). Age, gender, corneal graft diameter, and intraoperative vitreous loss had no statistically significant effects on the PKP outcome (P> 0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the probabilities of graft survival were 99.8% at 1 year and 97.6% at 5 years after transplantation.
Conclusion: Performing PKP in eyes with keratoconus is associated with good visual results and an excellent graft outcome.
Keywords: penetrating keratoplasty, keratoconus, graft failureAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).