Comparative diagnosis of premature rupture of membrane by nitrazine test, urea, and creatinine estimation
Abstract
Objective: The study compared the reliability of nitrazine, urea, and creatinine in the diagnosis of premature rupture of membrane (PROM). Nitrazine strip measures pH levels while urea and creatinine are produced mainly in amniotic fluid and not in the maternal vagina.
Methods: Sixty-four pregnant women with demonstrable passage or pooling of liquor par vaginum on speculum examination and 64 with no liquor drainage at 28–42 weeks gestation were studied. Vaginal fluid aspirates from both groups of patient were tested for urea, creatinine, and pH levels using nitrazine strip. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to determine cutoff values for urea and creatinine. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 23.0 and setting statistical significance at P ≤ 0.05.
Results: Nitrazine test showed high level of specificity (100%) but a sensitivity of 87.5%. Predictive ability of urea at >12.7 mg/dl obtained as cutoff value from the ROC curve showed a sensitivity of 19.64% and specificity of 94.44% while for creatinine the cutoff value was at >0.8 mg/dl with sensitivity of 48.21% and specificity of 65.28%.
Conclusion: Nitrazine strip was the most reliable of the three in the diagnosis of PROM. This was followed by creatinine and then urea. In view of the gaps in sensitivity and accuracy and the importance of precise diagnosis to prevent maternal and fetal complications, there is still the need to find other affordable, more sensitive and more accurate biochemical marker/s that will help in diagnosing PROM especially in difficult cases.
Keywords:
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).