Assessment of diastasis recti abdominis: Clinimetric properties of four measuring instruments

Authors

  • Chidiebele Ojukwu 1. Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Nigeria, Enugu, Nigeria.
  • Anne Ezeigwe Enugu state University Teaching Hospital, Enugu
  • Chukwudi Ezeigwe Department of Physiotherapy, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital Nnewi, Anambra State, Nigeria
  • Chioma Ugwuonye Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Nigeria, Enugu, Nigeria

Keywords:

Diastometer, digital calipers, inter- rectus distance, palpation, ultra sound imaging

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to determine the intra- and inter-rater reliability of palpation technique, digital calipers, and diastometer, as well as their concurrent validity against ultrasound imaging.
Methods: Ninety consenting parous women (20–45 years), recruited from a postnatal clinic in Enugu, Nigeria, participated in this observational study. Two physiotherapists and a sonographer measured their inter rectus distance at the level of the umbilicus, 4.5 cm above and below it, respectively, using each of the four modalities. The intrarater measurements were taken at a week’s interval. Data were analyzed with descriptive and inferential statistics of intraclass correlation coefficient and paired samples T-test, at an alpha level set at P < 0.05.
Results: It showed the palpation technique (r = 0.749–0.967 and 0.658–0.917), digital calipers (r=0.750–0.955 and 0.685–0.904), and diastometer (r=0.762–0.958 and 0.471–0.902) demonstrated good inter- and intra-rater reliability. The concurrent validity of the palpation technique, digital calipers, and diastometer against the USI was poor at all three reference points.
Conclusion: Palpation technique, digital calipers, and diastometer are reliable tools but not valid substitutes to ultrasound imaging for the clinical measurement of diastasis rectus abdominis

Downloads

Published

2023-11-01

How to Cite

Ojukwu, C., Ezeigwe, A., Ezeigwe, C., & Ugwuonye, C. (2023). Assessment of diastasis recti abdominis: Clinimetric properties of four measuring instruments. International Journal of Health Sciences, 17(6), 6–14. Retrieved from https://pub.qu.edu.sa/index.php/journal/article/view/8121

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 6 (2023): Nov-Dec

Section

Original Paper

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).